Yesterday, Tuesday, I went to the University of Andijan to meet the professor of philosophy and the head of the department, Mrs. Farideh. The head of her office knew English, but she brought the English teacher to be more sure.
My philosophy is logical and reasonable, so until now all philosophers have accepted it, but each of them had questions.
Professor Farideh said: Our problem is that we have different ethnic groups and religions in the country, each of which has a different culture and different demands, and it is very difficult to determine and implement the same law for everyone!?
I said: I am familiar with this issue and I have written about it before and that solving the economic problem is very simple. Solving social problems is the most difficult. This is why I called Western philosophers false and against reason and philosophy and in a way religious, because they, like the prophets, present a law (suitable to the West and their own country) for everyone. But I say that I don’t have a law for everyone, and every country should make a law for itself, and this is your duty, philosophers, the only general rule that I have said is this point.
At the end, we took a souvenir photo, which unfortunately was deleted from my phone for a reason that is still unclear. In the end, she recommended that I go to university in Tashkent (the capital) and raise some issues with the professors of religions and history.
Hint:
Without knowing the concepts of freedom, independence, colonialism, physical and intellectual slavery, democracy, human rights, dictatorship, etc., movements are blind or confused.
Earlier, I brought up Socrates’ discussion about the limits of freedom and mentioned that anyone who wants to talk about freedom, for example, should write 5 pages first to at least convince himself that he has understood it and whether the freedom he is considering creates a disturbance for the freedom of others. ..
There are different issues in different countries. In Western countries, where all the power is in the hands of capitalists, they simply control and direct thoughts, and what helps them is their smallness (some countries are the size of a city), and on the other hand, almost a group of people. And the countries have one religion and one thought.
Immigrant countries like America, Canada, Australia, which do not have tribal ethnic roots and are simply controlled and directed by a powerful group. That is, they do not have people in the corners of their country with the same ethnic origin, with hundreds of thousands of people with different languages and cultures.
The most important point in freedom!
Each people’s understanding of freedom and respect for the rights of others. As a result, they should consider a limit for their freedom and that of others, which is different for countries and people there. This is the point that I have left as a duty to philosophers who are the wisest and have accepted my philosophy.
Wednesday
November 6, 2024
Andijan – Uzbekistan
The philosopher of the school
M. Hassan Baygan
