To know a way of thinking, you have to know its root. In the countries of the world, university professors are engaged in philosophical discussions, and each of them promotes a false Western philosopher and claims to understand his statements. In Iran today, the so-called philosophers of the pro-Western faction have put Kant and liberalism at the top of their agenda, and have led reason, philosophy, and thus politics to error and corruption.
In order to examine the mistakes of Kant and his philosophy, there is no need to go into the details of his words because this is the old Iranian advice that says:
The house is completely destroyed; The ignorant landlord is in the trap of painting the house.
It is enough to pay attention to two basic points:
1- In what era did Kant live and for whom did he write?
2- What was Kant’s intellectual origin?
Kant lived at a time when the Western countries were hounding the world; They enslaved countries and people, committed large scale open and shameless killings, drove many people into poverty, and killed many people for lack of reason, and in this way built palaces that are still admired. Certainly, the rulers of these countries had no mercy for the people of their country, the most obvious point was sending them to kill and be killed. And for both of these, they had to find ways, in the meantime, false philosophers, including Kant, etc., came to their aid and are still coming.
Kant wrote books about ethics!
Someone who writes about morality and humanity should criticize looting, killing, colonialism, etc., all that European countries did at that time as anti-morality and anti-humanity. It is certain that if Kant had done so, there would have been many risks even for his life and that at least he would have been censored and his work would not have reached this level of fame. As they censor me and threaten me with death and stamp as mad/crazy…..
Getting into philosophy is definitely getting into politics, and you should write about it and condemn wars, colonialism, exploitation, looting, killing, and every ugly and anti-human act. And if he doesn’t do that, it means self-censorship or submission to the powerful, in which case that person is not a philosopher because a philosopher must be the bravest of people.
In the service of these wealthy murderers in the world, Kant determined the system and method of running the country for them. This system was not universal, but only for those people, and it had nothing to do with democracy, human rights, and freedom, but the opposite.
Of course, today that system or method is not responsible even for the same Western countries, and if they mention liberalism, it is far from what was said two centuries ago. Today they act in a different way according to their own interests.
It should be seen who are the rulers there today and how they rule over other nations and loot their resources.
The path taken by the West is not based on philanthropy and respect for humans; Rather, even according to the beliefs of some powerful/western rulers, the people of the world are dirty dogs and slaves. Such thinking does not work in any way with others on the basis of equality and respect. So, even if we accept that these countries are governed on the basis of liberalism, the liberalism system of these rich powerful people is not applicable in the countries under domination.
The above point is mixed with Kant’s religiousness!
A religious person means someone who puts a religion, a book, and a religious leader at the top of everything, no matter how logical and reasonable he may speak, but because he must ultimately reach his “sacredness/holy things” and not negate it, he is completely out of logic and reason.
But a philosopher does not have any pre-conditions or sanctity in his discussions, and he does not aim to reach something predetermined, but he deals with the issues with logic and reason until what is the result.
Therefore, Kant and all those who are religious are not philosophers, but they are called “sages/scientist” in Iran. It is not surprising that the speakers of Kant and liberalism in Iran are also religious.
If Kant was a true philosopher and had a sense of humanity, his energy should have been spent on condemning crimes and not serving criminals and giving them a plan to run the country.
Look at the people who were oppressed by the West in Africa, and today their voices are raised to prosecute those criminals. And now tell them about liberalism and Kant. It is not without reason that my philosophy is the most popular among university professors and African people, and it replaces the false philosophies of the West.
How is it possible to implement the opinions that a religious (Christian) person gave more than two hundred years ago for the rule of slave owners, looters and colonists for Iran, a society with a Muslim majority and with a completely different history and culture from the West. Such people who do not know these simple points and are placed at the top of the universities and leave the control of the universities’ intellect in their hands, if not to say that it is the conspiracy of the colonialists who have infiltrated the government, then it can be said that it is due to the irrationality of the government.
These followers of Kant in Iran are religious, and as a result, they are far from philosophy, real reason, and as a result, the human system.
All my philosophical effort is to free thoughts from the “intellectual slavery” that the West imposes on different countries, even their own people, by special institutes and false philosophers with propaganda.
While people in the West are turning away from religion, the owners of wealth and power are using the weapon of false philosophies to mislead people’s thoughts. But my philosophy easily scandalizes and defeats them.
February 13, 2025
Tangier – Morocco
The philosopher of the school
M. Hassan Baygan
