Iran’s military victory over the West!

Iran’s direct military attack on Israel was a major victory over Israel and its direct military allies (the United States and Britain) and other Western backers!

Today at midnight, Iran attacked Israeli military sites with several hundred drones and dozens of missiles.

1- In every battle, the attacker usually wins because he has gathered his strength and is attacked while the enemy is not ready at that point. But if the enemy is aware of the attack, that is, by spies and … Knowing the attack, he prepares his forces and in fact the attacker is trapped, so his defeat is inevitable.

2- In this case, Iran itself declared an attack a few days ago, wrote to the United Nations, and gave all the evidence of the attack, even at a certain hour. On the other hand, the flight of Iranian drones over Iraq and the movement to Israel were shown in the media.

3- Israel and its military collaborators, the United States and Britain, which together constitute a very large military power, entered the war against these Iranian airbirds, which they should have simply wiped out at the beginning of their entry into Israel (if not before they arrived).

4- Israel says it has destroyed more than 90 percent of drones and missiles, while the rest have fallen into the desert, with no damage to life or property.

5- Regarding the loss of life, the soldiers were in the bunker, and as Iran declared and was done in practice, the attack focused only on military bases. It is not surprising that the loss of life is even zero.

Where was Iran’s victory:

1- Iran is more than 1,000 kilometers away from Israel and must be crossed over two or three countries. For this purpose, passenger flights had to be halted (this was a sign of an attack) so that they would not be threatened. But crossing over countries with drones required their cooperation, which is why Iranian drones were not thought to fly over Jordan. Maybe it was an initial surprise. Jordan also reacted militarily.

2- The evidence now shows that a number of Iranian missiles hit sensitive Israeli bases including the country’s largest and most guarded military airfield, where even the president’s private sensitive plane is located, which is sure to have caused damage to it so that after the attack, Israel was forced to relocate the plane, while before the Iranian attack it was safely located. Assuming that Iran is not capable of attacking.

3- Videos released by the people show that Israeli Ammunition ended at the end of the attack and that Iran was hitting every spot with the simplest missiles. While Iran still has better and more advanced missiles than they used to be.

4- Iran’s missiles passed through Iron Dome, Patriot and Arrow defenses, and showed that Iran’s missiles outperformed the West’s best defensive weapons (the U.S. gave Israel its best) and defeated them easily.

Political commentary:

Before Iran invaded the United States, Israel and the entire West (the Jewish colonies), Russia seemed to have warned that it would use nuclear weapons if they intended to attack Iran. This is an important point that I mentioned earlier in my writings that Israel would use the atomic bomb unless Iran had one. Now, “Russia seems compelled to do so because it knows that Iran’s defeat is also its failure.”

It should be noted that I mentioned at the beginning of the Gaza War:

If it comes to the point where Israel is fully successful in Gaza, Hezbollah and … To prevent this victory, Russia is forced to give Iran a nuclear weapon, which is controlled by Russian personnel because it is not easy to use and requires long training.

In today’s attack, Iran showed that it has good foresights and plans, not only from a political point of view but also from a military standpoint, and is acting globally.

Will Israel strike back?

If nuclear and magnetic bombs or weapons in this wide array are taken from Israel, Israel has nothing more to attack Iran than planes and perhaps missiles that do not appear to be effective by flying over multiple countries.

But on the other hand, Iran showed that it could easily target the most sensitive parts of Israel, and then the people of Israel would be forced to leave the country exhausted and desperate.

Note that the continuation of such a war in the region would result in a complete cessation of commercial flights and many other activities that would disrupt the economy of the entire region (especially the sheikhdoms), so that apart from threatening the rest of the country with its own skies to Israeli warplanes, they would willingly do so themselves.

The collapse of the region’s economic situation, which would also disrupt oil exports, would force the West to retreat.

This means that Israel must close the sky before the attack, which means that Iran can carry out a counterattack at the right time, even before the Israeli attack.

But it seems impossible for Israel to be able to carry out an operation against Iran by crossing the skies of Syria and Iraq, and of course it is not easy to get permission from Jordan and Saudi Arabia, because Iran’s threat to respond to them is serious.

The militarization of Iran was inevitable!

Several years ago I wrote:

There are two ways to progress and thus confront the West.

1- Financial strengthening. But this is not possible, because the wealth of the West and its influence in the world is so great that it never allows any growth to other countries, especially Iran and… and even Russia (the story of China is different).

2- military. This is possible to some extent and Iran can invest in this one.

Now, after this period of time, the correctness of my opinions has been completely proven.

Note: Everything I mentioned “I have written before” is on my site.

Now/from today, it seems that Israel will use all its strength to destroy or at least push back Hezbollah and push it away from its borders to a certain extent; But considering the missiles that Iran has given to Hezbollah, this is no longer possible.

Disturbance inside Iran!

On the other hand, Israel and the West want to concentrate their forces inside Iran. Considering their strong propaganda power (such as the story of women, life, freedom, which is the real goal of the West, women, prostitution, slavery) if it succeeds, then there will be no other way for Iran to start the war again, because the goal The West is a civil war and the disintegration of Iran, and the overwhelming majority of Iranians do not like this. So the whole region is under pressure as I mentioned in the above lines.

Result:

The West has no way but to compromise with Iran, Russia and China, that is, to retreat; Or to give in to a full-scale apocalyptic nuclear war.

The West has long since lost its former hegemonic power and is barely making its last efforts. These efforts can rightly be likened to the efforts of a person in a swamp, the more he wades, the deeper and faster he sinks.

afternoon

April 14, 2024

Uppsala – Sweden

The philosopher of the school

M. H. ‌Baygan

My book was banned in Sweden! My book was banned in Sweden!

The English Bookshop in Uppsala, was named the best at the London Book Fair in 2022 (according to the attached text published in the UNT Uppsala newspaper 25 july).

A few years ago, I brought my book “Jesus Christ and his mother Mary were not Jews, rather they were Mandaean” in English to this bookstore. The middle-aged man graciously accepted five copies for sale and said humorously, “Send one to President Trump!”. What he meant was that the book would shatter Trump’s entire religious mental context.

Shortly afterwards I went to the Trail. A woman bitterly handed me my books that they had packaged and said, “We can’t sell this book. She did not elaborate much, but it turned out that the text, which distorted all Jewish power over Christians and the West (because they thought they were according to the Gospel became Jewish servants or dogs. You can read my writing on this subject) and questioned the entire Christian Bible; it was not pleasant for these people.

This is freedom of speech and… in Sweden .

Where is the frontier of freedom, including freedom of speech?

Apparently, the powerful and the rich have already determined it.

Why do they ban my book, because this book of mine has distorted the entire intellectual underpinnings of Christianity and thus dissipates the power of the Church, Christianity and Judaism.

I have received death threats many times in the West (Sweden, etc.) for my philosophical views, that means, I have been given a death sentence.

There are many in this West and the Christian world who say that to me: you have made the greatest revolution in history, and that you are the bravest.

Even the head of the National Library of Ukraine said: “We have two million books, all on one side and your book on one side.” She gave the value of alla books i whole world to my book. Of course I have written short of my philosophy in the book as well.

Hint:

No Iranian publisher, even abroad, who claims to defend freedom of expression and easily publish banned books in Iran, would have been willing to publish my books (in English and Persian).

A few publishers were introduced by some prominent people and cultural institutions as brave publishers in Iran and the West, but until they became aware of the text of the books, they no longer remembered me.

Then I sent my books (almost 6 books aboute Philosophy, religion, history, socity …) electronically to the printing press.

A few years ago, I was introduced to a printing house by a friend. I wanted him to print the books in a small number. I wanted to give them to some intellectuale and institutions. He printed the book, and I was ready to go there to get it. He said: I was scared when I read the front page out of curiosity. He said he destroyed the books and paid the price. Because he’s afraid of causing him trouble.

What book do you know in the world that is like that? It is an honor that has been given to me alone in the whole world.

July 26, 2023

Uppsala – Sweden

The true philosopher

M. Hassan Baygan

The culmination of stupidity in the words of the Prime Minister and the Swedish statesmen!

.Today, after a long time, the stupid Swedish government realized that it had lost its face in the world by burning the Koran, and the Prime Minister of Sweden announced it. It was what I wrote from the very beginning and even I wrote that you have played with the security of Sweden and Swedish in other countries, and this is also accepted by the Swedish government today.

But:

This stupid government said: “Behind this affair lies Russia and it is he who instigated and compel Islamic countries to react.”

This is one of the biggest insults to Muslim consciousness.

Muslim countries (specially Iran) are not like Sweden and Europe as USA colony.

They had meetings and talks about burning the Koran, and the incident of Sweden brought them closer together and took a stand against the West.

Poor people who fell from the hole to the well and came from Iran to the west and Sweden, and now we have no escape in this well.

July 26, 2023

Uppsala – Sweden

The true philosopher

M. Hassan Baygan

Sweden is on the way to become the most hated country!

Who and why are they pushing Sweden towards war and enmity with others?

A few years ago, I wrote an article titled Socialism in Sweden is dead. Now we are witnessing very fast movements of Sweden in a completely opposite direction of the last few centuries.

At the worst of the Ukraine-Russia war, Sweden applied to join NATO, the most stupid move possible. Because in this war, the end of which no one could guess, but the possibility of a large-scale and even nuclear conflict was coming and going, Sweden should have completely avoided any alliance with the conflicting parties and taking a position and played the role of a peace mediator.

Entering NATO in this situation will destroy all the infrastructure and system of Sweden.

The second completely suspicious and stupid move of Sweden is to insist on burning the Quran. By doing this, Sweden has offended dozens of Muslim countries and hundreds of millions of Muslims, which has endangered the security of Swedish in the world.

Even some non-Muslim and non-religious countries and ordinary people with any religion or anti-religion have taken a stand against this movement, which is completely against freedom of expression and is the burning book.

This work of Sweden may face all kinds of harsh or mild punitive reactions from some Muslim countries and people.

This work has threatened the security of Sweden in the world. As someone who has traveled to different countries and recently witnessed respect as a Swedish; Now I don’t feel safe traveling to many countries as a Sweden citizen.

However, with these two moves, Sweden has lost a lot of its face in the world and is becoming one of the most hated countries.

More or less similar movements have been and are taking place in relation to the countries of the world as well as within the country of Sweden.

It should be seen what kind of plan the capitalists ruling Sweden, especially the Zionist Jewish Wallenberry family, have drawn for Sweden and its helpless people.

Whenever the faction of capitalists intended to make fundamental changes in Sweden, they simply won the elections and after making the changes, they left the rest of the work to the social democrats. In this recent period, they won the elections and are undergoing very fundamental and radical changes.

June 29, 2023

Uppsala – Sweden

M. Hassan Baygan

New Day and New Year 1402 Blessed!

The year that passed was a difficult and heavy and decisive year for Iran and the world.

The course of world developments was struggling with Iran’s impasse.

In Iran, the Western-oriented/affiliated faction finally triggered a fierce internal conflict. Their attacks, which were carried out using young forces, had confounded the Eastern-oriented and unaffiliated/nationalist faction for some time. But the confrontation between the various factions affiliated with the West weakened this faction from the inside, and in fact, they themselves further destroyed themselves.

Also, the intervention of Westerners outside the regime (mostly abroad) created a massive disturbance (be careful, the turmoil within this faction) among all of them. As a result, there was no need for the East Wing to do something special, but they themselves (pro west) took the roots of each other.

Short remarks:

The defeat of westerners, who did not have one-handed leadership, broke the impasse in relations between East and change in the world, leaving open the hands of the Eastist/nationalist faction led by the Khamenei.

Since then, every day (really every day) has seen a new opening in eastern relations and a new impasse in the West.

Western countries are religious and do not accept other than Christians. Western sovereignty and governments are mostly Christian-Zionist. But eastern countries each have different religions, and some are completely ungodly. This is an important point for an equal and human relationship between the peoples of the world. In Western religious thought, there is no room for humanity, democracy, independence, freedom, human rights and free relations between countries.

Last year was a difficult and breathtaking year, but Iran was able to emerge victorious, and the current enemies of Iran and humanity fall into a straitjacket and even the path of great collapse.

Next year looks like a year of more openings. Because the unity of the non-religious East and the demand for equal relations between countries has won over the religious West and against human equality.

It is hoped that the economic situation, social welfare and civil liberties will improve for Iran and the whole world, even the West, which is dominated by colonialists.

Note:

March 21, 2023, which is called New Day, is the first day of the New Year for people with Aryan roots all over the world and some other peoples.

20 mars 2023

Last Day of 1401

Uppsala – Swede

Hassan ‌Baygan

Comparing Kerkizestan problem with Iran

Comparing Kerkizestan problem with Iran

Have you seen what is going on in Kerkizestan?

In the best situation that could happen in Iran last year, other wise a long term civil war was more possible.

Mr. Mousavi who was prim Minister for 8 years and in his time most of opposition has been killed and run away from Iran (like me) never criticize  himself. If incase he has been changed and become what it called a democrat person he had to start criticize himself at first, but he didn’t.

What has he started (with demonstration) last year was like that happened in Kerkizestan (few times) and the result of it comes now, starting civil war!

If that was not stopped in Iran last year then it certainly could be civil war and 1000 times more people could be killed.

Civil war in Iran can never compare with Afghanistan or Iraq.

Besides it could be longer and bigger war in the region and no country in the world could stop it. That could effect the whole world situation like as problem with oil export and dividing Iran in few countries.

Dividing Iran means that Iran can be divided to about 6 countries. One of them will be Kurdistan and that affect the neighboring countries. This is the one neither Turkey nor Syrian or Iraq wants. This is one of the reasons why turkey act against Israel and allowed sending ship to Gaza. Because even now Israel is in Iraq Kurdistan and interfering with the problem (in other word making problem), that is what Turkey doesn’t like and because of that has no other choose than working together with Iran.

This problem in Iran is not over and all politicians in the world should be careful about the sensibility of Iran for the region and the whole world. War in Iran can not stop only in Iran but even comes to many other countries over Middle East.

If you want to know what is really going on in the region? I have written about all that and what could be happened in the region, many years ago, you can find it in my site and asking your adviser to translate them from Persian.

June 15, 2010

Hassan Baygan

Uppsala – Sweden

Hassan@baygan.net

www.baygan.org

Demokrati i Sverige!!!

 Salam alla!
 
Idag torsdag 24 juni kom jag till SIU:s informationsmöte rörande valet 2010. 
Alla informatorer gav en del bra och givande information förutom Paul Reichberg, NBV:s ordförande.
Han började väldigt stressigt och höll sig inte alls till ämnet.
Han pratade om demokrati, som han i hans tal, hade helt fel uppfattning om. Han var väldigt okunnig om historia, religion, samhälle, kultur o s v.
För mig var det som tortyr, likt att sitta som en skolstudent under obligatoriska former, och lyssna till vad som sades på denna låga nivå och på detta felaktiga sätt.
 
Men det värsta var, att han som ett bevis för demokrati och yttrandefrihet i Sverige, ville rättfärdiga Lars Vilks, då denne ritade Islams Profet som hund.
 
Alla vet att jag inte alls tror på gud. Jag är inte kommunist eller hindu etc. Jag har min egen filosofi och tar inte efter någon i hela världen.
Jag ser en väldigt stor skillnad mellan yttrandefrihet och frihet att säga fula ord till andra.
Jag själv skriver mycket kritik riktad till alla religioner, men utan att skymfa dessa. 
Det jag skriver är skrivet utifrån ett akademiskt forskningsperspektiv och jag hyser stor respekt till dem jag riktar mig till. Därför jag har aldrig mottagit något hot från muslimer, vilka endast har sagt till mig ”Det är synd att du är inte muslim”, då jag har lett och svarat ” Jag tror inte på någon gud alls”.
Jag har också i mitt skrivande riktat mig mot kommunism och även de har sagt “Det är synd du är inte kommunist”. Var för säger de alla så? Därför att ett akademiskt präglat jobb med respekt inte sårar folk. 
 
Vi måste veta att så länge människor pratar med respekt för varandra kan de prata eller diskutera hur mycket som helst, men så fort någon börjar använda fult språk blir resultatet våld och krig. Tänk om jag eller någon skulle svara Reichberg med samma språk som han pratade och stod för, då skulle man säga massor med fula ord till honom. Kan man diskutera så här? Och tror ni att saker skulle fungera i detta samhälle om folk pratade på detta sätt med varandra? Det var därför Platon sade “Demokrati är det värsta system som finns.” (läs min artrikel/bok om demokrati och Platon på min hemsida).
Jag frågade Reichberg: Då i Sverige frimurarna och Bilderberg-gruppen har så mycket makt och då det är dem som styr Sverige på riktigt, och regeringen inte har någon verklig makt, hur kan då Sverige vara ett demokratiskt land? Reichberg hade inget annat val än att acceptera att Sverige inte är ett demokratisk land.
Egentligen ville jag inte ha en sådan här diskussion på ett sådant här möte och jag hade bestämt mig för att inte prata om detta innan jag kom till mötet, men hans dåliga och låga kunskap tvingade mig att med en sådan här kort fråga pressa honom att ta tillbaks hans påstående att  
”Sverige är ett demokratisk land”, istället för att säga “Sverige är ett icke-demokratiskt land.”
Innan jag kom till mötet bestämde jag mig för att försöka undvika denna dialog, men diskussionen visar ändå att makten inte innehas av regeringen och att Sverige är ett icke-demokratisk land, varpå följdfrågan kommer: ”Varför ska man då rösta?”.
 
 
Nu skriver jag bara några få punkter om Paul Reichbergs tal, fastän jag skulle kunna skriva mycket mer: 
 
1.   Denna kontroversiella diskussion var inte passande på ett sådant här möte.
2.    Vad hade han väntat sig av detta? Vill han att vi lär oss av detta och går till de invandare som är muslimer och säger: ”Kom och delta i valet, detta är ett demokratisk land där ni får säga  hur mycket fula ord som helst till varandra och även kränka heliga människor, era mödrar och era nära och kära”.
3.    När man säger fula ord om någon helig människa eller någon ledare är detta en direkt skymf till alla de personer som tror på honom eller respekterar honom.
4.    Jag själv har två muslimska grannar. En av mina grannar har två barn som är födda i Sverige och är muslimer, vad ska jag säga till dem? Ska jag säga “Detta är ett demokratisk land och de som skymfade Mohammad och dig hade rätt, kom nu och rösta. Detta lärde vi oss på mötet.”?
5.    Jag tror Reichberg ville utnyttja detta möte för att visa sitt stöd för Lars Vilks och för (de blåa) högerallianspartieterna och detta är helt fel.
6.    I normala fall går jag aldrig till ett seminarium där en sådan här okunnig människa pratar. Den typen av människor ska stoppas.
7.    Jag kände mig väldigt kränkt av att sitta och lyssna på en sådan här oartig människa som inte hade någon respekt för oss mötesdeltagare.
 
 
Jag har ett förslag:
Nästa gång Reichberg och liknande personer talar någonstans på detta sätt och jag är där, så svarar jag med samma språk. Det betyder att jag kommer att säger alla fula ord jag kan till honom/henne. Då får vi se hur mycket han/hon tål sin egen typ av demokrati och yttrandefrihet.
I det fall han/hon säger att han/hon blev sårad och kände sig kränkt, kan man säga: 
“Paul Reichberg sade att det inte var en kränkning att säga fula ord till andra”. Då har personen som talat i linje med Reichberg motsagt sig själv. 
Vad som också kan hända är att talaren säger “Jag känner mig kränkt och ska anmäla dig”. Då blir jag glad och svarar “Varför? Det är väl demokrati?, och i din typ av demokrati har man rätt att säga vad man vill, precis på det sätt som du har klargjort”.
Och om det är frågan om en anmälan blir jag verkligen glad, då kommer jag i min tur anmäla honom/henne och begära skadestånd, då det var han/hon som manade fram kränkningen.
 
Detta ska jag göra och min förvissning är att alla andra också kommer att göra det. 
 
 
 
2010-06-24
 
Med vänlig hälsning
 
Hassan Baygan
 
hassan@baygan.net
www.baygan.org